Skip to content

Results from a Survey of Faculty Adoption of Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) in Computer Science

Reference: Helen H. Hu, Clifton Kussmaul, Brian Knaeble, Chris Mayfield, Aman Yadav. (2016). Results from a Survey of Faculty Adoption of Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) in Computer Science. In ITiCSE ‘16.

Entry Key: \cite{hu-2016-survey}

Entry Type: @inproceedings

Abstract

This paper presents an analysis of CS faculty perceptions of the benefits of POGIL, the obstacles to POGIL adoption, and opportunities for professional development. Participants strongly agreed that with POGIL, students are more engaged and active, develop communication and teamwork skills, and have better learning outcomes. The largest perceived obstacle was lack of preparation time; other obstacles included availability of relevant POGIL activities and pressure to cover more content. Participants expressed a desire for further training and mentoring beyond workshops. Our data analysis also considers bivariate associations and interactions. The results should help to improve professional development for CS faculty adopting evidence-based strategies, and thereby help more CS students to be successful.

Metadata

Download .bib file

Field Value
author Hu, Helen H. and Kussmaul, Clifton and Knaeble, Brian and Mayfield, Chris and Yadav, Aman
title Results from a Survey of Faculty Adoption of Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) in Computer Science
year 2016
isbn 9781450342315
publisher Association for Computing Machinery
address New York, NY, USA
url https://doi.org/…
doi 10.1145/2899415.2899471
booktitle Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education
pages 186–191
numpages 6
keywords pogil, guided inquiry, faculty adoption
location Arequipa, Peru
series ITiCSE ‘16